Meta Collab
Edit Page
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
 
Another important distinction is the borders around which a mass cooperation can be defined. Due to the extremely general characteristics and lack of need for fine grain negotiation and consensus when cooperating, the entire Internet, a city and even the global economy may be regarded as a mass cooperation. Thus a mass collaboration is more refined and complex in its process and production on the level of collective engagement.
 
Another important distinction is the borders around which a mass cooperation can be defined. Due to the extremely general characteristics and lack of need for fine grain negotiation and consensus when cooperating, the entire Internet, a city and even the global economy may be regarded as a mass cooperation. Thus a mass collaboration is more refined and complex in its process and production on the level of collective engagement.
   
==Mass collaboration & the online forum==
+
==Mass collaboration as distinct from the online forum==
 
Although an online discussion is certainly collaborative, mass collaboration differs from a large forum/bulletin board, email list, chat session or group discussion in that the discussion's structure of separate, individual posts generated through [[turn-taking]] communication means the textual content does not take the form of a single, coherent body. Of course the conceptual domain of the overall discussion exists as a single unified body, however the textual contributors can be linked back to the understandings and interpretations of a single author. Though the author's understandings and interpretations are most certainly a negotiation of all that they have in the discussion, the fact that there was only one author of a given entry reduces the entry's [[collaborative complexity]] to the discursive/interpretive as opposed to constructive/‘negotiative’ levels.
 
Although an online discussion is certainly collaborative, 'mass collaboration' differs from a large forum/bulletin board, email list, chat session or group discussion in that the discussion's structure of separate, individual posts generated through [[turn-taking]] communication means the created content does not take the form of a single, unified body. Of course the conceptual domain of the overall discussion exists as a single body, however the components of this body can be linked back to the understandings and interpretations of a single author. The fact that there is only one author of a given entry in such cases reduces the contribution's [[collaborative complexity]] in that negotiation of contributions needn't be synthetic and instead represents the [[exquisite corpse]] model of [[collaboration]]. This model utilises primarily [[cooperative]] as opposed to collaborative methods (i.e. negotiation is not employed for the creation of individual contributions) in order to generate a creative output. Therefore, such online forums constitute [[stigmergic collaboration|stigmergic]], [[discursive collaboration]] as opposed to mass collaboration.
 
   
 
==The role of discussion in mass collaboration==
 
==The role of discussion in mass collaboration==
Please note that all contributions to the Meta Collab are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)