I believe that is related somehow to a theory of Collaboration, but I am trying to figure out how to work it into this page. --Srose 12:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, I see what you mean - I need to look more deeply as well. Please do post any insights you might have. One thing I'm thinking is that the case of mass collaboration (high numbers over 12 acting as a creative network) doesn't seem to fit so well - maybe this has something to do with the fact that mass collaboration is distributed and its negotiation is mediated, putting it in a different class of interaction? -- Mark Elliott 21:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Just came across this page, which may also be somehow useful to you Please do not hesitate to participate there if the spirit moves you --Srose 16:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think that a majority of collaborative interactions are incidental. I think this is largely due to the fact that collaboration is a biological capacity for us humans - we don't have to do it consciously, it is simply a product of acting creatively with others?.. But this could probably be better thought out and there certainly could be a page on it here... -- Mark Elliott 21:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.